FOLLOW @LIYANSH404
FINANCE · 25 MIN READ

Kaynes Technology: India's electronics bet, explained

The profits are real, but the cash isn't showing up. The chip and PCB plants meant to fix that start earning only from late 2026.

COVERARGUELABS.IN

In January 2025, Kaynes was the market’s favourite way to own India’s chip dream: a small-town electronics maker from Mysuru building one of India’s first chip-packaging plants. The stock traded at about 200 times earnings. Twenty-one months later it is down 53% from its 52-week high, after an accounting scare, a CEO exit, a promoter share sale and guidance missed again and again.

The short answer: the profits are real, but the cash isn’t showing up. Since FY19 Kaynes has reported ₹1,006 Cr of profit and −₹550 Cr of operating cash flow. Most of the gap sits in one business, smart meters. The chip and PCB plants that are meant to fix the story start earning only from late 2026.

AT A GLANCEARGUELABS.IN
Kaynes at a glance, 20 Oct 2026Share price (19 Oct 2026)₹3,250-53% from the ₹6,998 highRevenue (FY26)₹3,626 CrUp 33%; ₹4,500 Cr+ was guidedEBITDA margin (FY26)15.9%The one promise keptOperating cash flow (FY26)-₹600 CrProfit was +₹364 CrReturn on equity8.7%Below its cost of capitalP/E (trailing)63x37x on FY28 consensus
SourceScreener.in, Kaynes results and calls · as of 20 Oct 2026

The industry in two minutes

Every car, smart meter, train signal, missile and MRI machine has a circuit board inside. Most brands don’t make those boards themselves. They hire an EMS company (electronics manufacturing services) to buy the parts and assemble them. India’s version of this industry is growing fast.

FIGURE 1ARGUELABS.IN
India's electronics output grew 6.9x in eleven yearsElectronics production, ₹ lakh crore. About half is mobile phones; Kaynes is in the other halfFY15: ₹1.9 lakh Cr1.9FY15FY18: ₹3.88 lakh Cr3.9FY18FY21: ₹5.54 lakh Cr5.5FY21FY22: ₹6.41 lakh Cr6.4FY22FY23: ₹8.25 lakh Cr8.3FY23FY24: ₹9.52 lakh Cr9.5FY24FY25: ₹11.32 lakh Cr11.3FY25FY26: ₹13.11 lakh Cr13.1FY26
SourcePIB, MeitY and ministerial replies · FY15–FY26 (FY16–17, FY19–20 not shown)
  • The boom is real, but mostly phones. Output reached ₹13.11 lakh Cr in FY26, up 15.8% (PIB). Phones are about 48% of it. The non-phone half, where Kaynes plays, grew only about 13% a year over FY24–26.
  • Forecasts run ahead of reality. KPMG sees India’s EMS market going from $40–45 bn (FY25) to about $150 bn by FY30. That needs growth far above what the official data shows. CareEdge is more cautious at 16% a year.
  • The government is paying for factories.
    • Components scheme (ECMS): 106 projects approved worth ₹69,548 Cr. Kaynes won 4 of the first 7 approvals (₹3,280 Cr of planned investment in PCBs, camera modules and laminates).
    • India Semiconductor Mission: pays 50% of a chip-packaging plant’s cost, plus state support. Kaynes’ plant in Sanand, Gujarat is one of only three mission units in production.
  • Two business models.
    • High-volume, low-mix (Dixon, Amber): make millions of phones or ACs at 4–7% margins, but get paid fast.
    • High-mix, low-volume (Kaynes, Syrma, Avalon, Centum): make thousands of complex boards for cars, factories, defence and trains at 11–16% margins. They tie up far more cash in inventory and receivables.

What this means for Kaynes: demand is not the problem. The question is whether a high-mix model can grow at 30%+ without eating all its cash.

How Kaynes makes money

Think of Kaynes as a high-end tailor for electronics. It doesn’t sell its own brand. It takes a customer’s design (a car’s motor controller, a train’s safety system, a defence radar board), sources the parts and builds it. Each customer needs few units but exact quality, so Kaynes earns a 15–16% margin, roughly double a phone assembler’s.

FIGURE 2ARGUELABS.IN
Kaynes is moving upstream: from assembling boards to making their parts1. DesignHelp the customerdesign the boardand the process2. Make the partsBare PCBs (Chennai)Chip packaging(OSAT, Sanand)NEW: sales from Q3 FY273. AssemblePut components onboards, build fullboxes. Core EMS4. CustomersCars, factories,trains, defence,medical, IoTSide business: smart meters (GridCrest, ex-Iskraemeco)Makes and installs meters for state power utilities, which pay slowly.FY26 revenue ₹971 Cr, but ₹1,311 Cr of unpaid bills (Jun 2026).Management is now shrinking it; a plan is due in Feb 2027.
SourceKaynes business model · 4 stages plus the smart-meter side business

The big bet is moving upstream. Instead of buying bare circuit boards and packaged chips, Kaynes wants to make them, with the government paying roughly half the factory cost. If it works, Kaynes captures more of each product’s value and becomes harder to replace.

FIGURE 3ARGUELABS.IN
Smart meters are a quarter of revenue and most of the cash problemFY26 revenue by customer type, % (smart meters split out of industrial)Smart meters: 27%Smart meters27%Other industrial and EV: 28%Other industrial and EV28%Automotive: 25%Automotive25%IoT, IT, consumer: 10%IoT, IT, consumer 10%Railways: 6%Railways 6%Aerospace & defence: 2%Aerospace & defence 2%Medical: 2%Medical 2%Smart meters = ₹971 Cr of ₹3,626 Cr; the deck reports them inside a 55% industrial-incl-EV bucket.
SourceKaynes Q4 FY26 investor deck; smart-meter revenue from the Aug 2026 call · FY26

Who the customers are:

  • Automotive and EV: a quarter of revenue.
  • Railways (Kavach safety systems): 6%.
  • Aerospace and defence: only 2%, despite the story.
  • Concentration: the top customer was 16% of FY25 revenue (FY26 deck).
  • Order book: ₹8,904 Cr (Jun 2026), about 2.3 years of revenue, but barely growing for three quarters.

From Mysuru to semiconductors

FIGURE 4ARGUELABS.IN
35 years of building, then 12 months of bad news1988Ramesh Kunhikannan starts Kaynes as a one-man business in Mysuru2008Incorporated as a company; plants follow in Chennai, Bengaluru, ManesarNov 2022IPO at ₹587, raising ₹858 CrDec 2023Raises ₹1,400 Cr from institutions at ₹2,424 a shareSep 2024Buys Iskraemeco India (smart meters) for ₹43 CrJan 2025Stock peaks near ₹7,600, about 200 times earningsMay 2025Buys August Electronics (Canada) for CAD 57 mJun 2025Promoter sells ₹625 Cr of shares; two weeks later, a ₹1,600 Cr raise at ₹5,570Sep 2025CEO resigns; Dr Muthukumar Narayanaswamy becomes MDDec 2025Kotak flags undisclosed related-party deals; stock falls ~31% in 2 weeksMar 2026Sanand chip-packaging plant (Unit 1) inauguratedMay 2026FY26 misses guidance; cash flow -₹600 Cr; numeric guidance droppedSep 2026New auditor approved: Walker Chandiok (Grant Thornton Bharat)MilestoneGovernance or guidance event
SourceCompany filings, rating rationales and media · 1988–2026; not to scale

Two things stand out:

  • Kaynes is a capital raiser. Since its 2022 IPO it has raised about ₹3,660 Cr of fresh equity. Over FY23–FY26 its free cash flow was −₹3,267 Cr, roughly the same amount.
  • The timing of the promoter’s sale hurts trust. On 4 Jun 2025 the founder sold 1.8% of the company for ₹625 Cr at about ₹5,551. Two weeks later the company raised ₹1,600 Cr from institutions at ₹5,570. The sale was legal and disclosed. Today the stock is at ₹3,250.
FIGURE 5ARGUELABS.IN
Shareholders' new money has been paying for the cash gap₹ Cr. Fresh equity since the Nov 2022 IPO vs free cash flow over FY23-FY26Fresh equity raisedIPO + Dec 2023 + Jun 2025 raises₹3,660Free cash flow, FY23-FY26operating cash flow minus capex-₹3,267Free cash outflow over four years used up an amount equal to about 89% of the equity raised.
SourceExchange filings (equity raised); Screener.in cash flows · FY23–FY26

The moat and the competitors

Kaynes has the best margins in its peer group and the worst cash conversion. That combination is the whole debate.

CompanyModelMarket cap (₹ Cr)P/EOperating margin (TTM)ROCEROECash cycle (days)
KaynesHigh-mix21,84762.915.6%12.7%8.7%193
Syrma SGSHigh-mix29,84280.411.2%16.8%14.0%48
AvalonHigh-mix13,51410111.4%19.3%16.5%160
CentumHigh-mix5,88367.311.8%25.5%−12.5%234
DixonHigh-volume74,01639.43.6%29.2%18.9%−7
AmberHigh-volume23,0281127.3%10.3%6.0%53

All figures from Screener.in, 20 Oct 2026.

FIGURE 6ARGUELABS.IN
Best margin in the group, nearly the slowest cash: that is the whole debateOperating margin (TTM) vs cash conversion cycle; bubble size = market cap (Screener, 20 Oct 2026)Ideal: high margin, fast cash0%4%8%12%16%050100150200250Cash conversion cycle, days (lower is better) →Operating marginKaynes: 15.6% margin, 193 days, ₹21,847 CrKaynes · 193dSyrma SGS: 11.2% margin, 48 days, ₹29,842 CrSyrma SGS · 48dAvalon: 11.4% margin, 160 days, ₹13,514 CrAvalon · 160dCentum: 11.8% margin, 234 days, ₹5,883 CrCentum · 234dDixon: 3.6% margin, -7 days, ₹74,016 CrDixon · -7dAmber: 7.3% margin, 53 days, ₹23,028 CrAmber · 53d
SourceScreener.in · 20 Oct 2026
FIGURE 7ARGUELABS.IN
Kaynes turns the least of its profit into cash among its peersOperating cash flow as % of operating profit, FY22-FY26 combined (Screener)DixonDixon: 90%90%AmberAmber: 89%89%CentumCentum: 87%87%Syrma SGSSyrma SGS: 20%20%AvalonAvalon: 18%18%KaynesKaynes: -41%-41%Negative = the business consumed cash while reporting profit.
SourceScreener.in consolidated cash flows and P&L · FY22–FY26

Moat scorecard:

Moat sourceRatingWhy
Switching costsStrongBoards for cars, trains, defence and medical are qualified for years; customers rarely move them
Pricing powerModerateHighest margin among peers (~16%), but only kept by staying in niche, low-volume work
Technology and IPModerateDesign services plus early entry in chip packaging; little proprietary product
ScaleWeakRevenue is under a tenth of Dixon’s, and smaller than Syrma’s
Customer concentrationModerateTop customer 16% of FY25 revenue

Second-order: a high margin means little if the cash never arrives. Syrma earns 11% but collects in 48 days; Kaynes earns 16% but waits 193. Per rupee of capital, Syrma creates more value. That is why it trades at 80x while Kaynes trades at 63x.

Growth engines: the new plants

The market is paying for two factories that have not earned a rupee yet. Both are real, government-backed, and late.

FIGURE 8ARGUELABS.IN
Only 9% of the expected chip-plant subsidy has arrived so farKaynes Semicon OSAT, Sanand (Gujarat), ₹ CrTotal project costTotal project cost: ₹3,307 Cr3,307Govt subsidy expected (50% + 20%)Govt subsidy expected (50% + 20%): ₹1,830 Cr1,830Spent so farSpent so far: ₹700 Cr700Subsidy received (to Jul 2026)Subsidy received (to Jul 2026): ₹170 Cr170Subsidy expected = 70% of about ₹2,615 Cr eligible capex (annual report); spent and received from the Aug 2026 call.
SourceKaynes annual report FY26, Q1 FY27 call · as of Jul 2026
EngineCapitalStatus (Oct 2026)Promised vs actualCustomers
Chip packaging (OSAT), Sanand₹3,307 Cr; ~₹1,830 Cr from central and Gujarat subsidiesUnit 1 (pilot) inaugurated 31 Mar 2026. Volume line due Q3 FY27Mass production promised by Jan 2026, then Jul 2026, now Q3 FY27Alpha & Omega Semiconductor (5-year offtake), Infineon, L&T Semiconductor
PCBs, Chennai~₹1,400 Cr phase 1; 4 ECMS approvals for ₹3,280 Cr of projects~₹500 Cr spent; plant not yet producingStart promised Apr 2026, then Jul 2026, now Q2–Q3 FY27One global customer has issued a vendor code
Smart meters (GridCrest)~₹1,311 Cr of receivables tied upBeing shrunk; strategy due Feb 2027Collection of an acquired ₹350 Cr receivable promised “next quarter” from 2025; ~₹80 Cr done by May 2026State utilities (RDSS scheme)
Railway safety (Kavach)SmallStill at trial ordersTrial completion promised mid-2025Indian Railways
FIGURE 9ARGUELABS.IN
Every new engine has slipped, some more than onceDate promised on earnings calls (hollow) vs the latest guided window (bar)Jan 25Jul 25Jan 26Jul 26Jan 27TodayChip plant (OSAT)mass productionJan 2026Jul 2026Q3 FY27Chennai PCB plantstartApr 2026Jul 2026Q2-Q3 FY27Kavach rail trialscompleteMid-2025still in trials
SourceKaynes earnings call transcripts, Jan 2025–Aug 2026 · windows are the latest guidance

Revenue expected: management now guides ₹450–500 Cr from OSAT plus PCBs in FY27, all in the second half. In Feb 2026 it spoke of at least ₹1,500 Cr from OSAT and ₹1,000 Cr from PCBs by FY28; in May 2026 it said it had “not given any guidance like this”.

Will the new plants earn their cost of capital? Our estimate, at maturity around FY30–31:

  • OSAT: about 14% pre-tax ROCE in the base case (range −2% to 38%). Without the subsidy it would be about 2%.
  • PCBs: 12–17% in the base case.
  • Breakeven: operating breakeven around FY28–29; cash payback around FY32–33.

The subsidy is what makes the economics work, so how fast it is paid matters as much as the factory itself.

Management: what they said vs what happened

We read seven earnings calls in full (Jan 2025 to Aug 2026), including the special call after the Kotak report in Dec 2025. The Feb 2026 call came from secondary transcripts, and we also used interviews and filings. The pattern is consistent: margins are delivered, and almost everything else (revenue, cash, dates) is missed.

FIGURE 10ARGUELABS.IN
2 promises kept, 7 missed or slipped since Jan 2025What management said on earnings calls vs what happenedPromiseGuidedDeliveredFY25 revenue: missedFY25 revenueOver ₹3,000 Cr₹2,722 CrFY26 revenue: missedFY26 revenue₹4,500 Cr+ (Jul 2025)₹3,626 CrFY26 EBITDA margin: keptFY26 EBITDA marginAbout 15.6%15.9%FY26 operating cash flow: missedFY26 operating cash flowSignificantly positive-₹600 CrWorking capital days: missedWorking capital days70-85 days122-133 daysCollect acquired meter dues (₹350 Cr): missedCollect acquired meter dues (₹350 Cr)Next quarter (2025)~₹80 Cr by May 2026Build Sanand chip plant (Unit 1): keptBuild Sanand chip plant (Unit 1)By FY26Opened 31 Mar 2026Chip plant mass production: slippedChip plant mass productionJan 2026Now Q3 FY27PCB plant start: slippedPCB plant startApr 2026Now Q2-Q3 FY27US$1 bn revenue by FY28: riskUS$1 bn revenue by FY28Feb 2026Needs ~51% a yearPositive cash flow by FY27 end: openPositive cash flow by FY27 endAug 2026Q1 was -₹259 CrKeptSlippedMissedAt riskOpen
SourceKaynes earnings call transcripts, Jan 2025–Aug 2026

How to read Kaynes’ guidance: cut revenue guidance by about 20%, accept margin guidance, add two quarters to any project date, and treat positive cash flow as unproven until two quarters show it. Management dropped numeric guidance in May 2026. It now says “twice the market” growth, about 15–18% plus the new plants.

What changed at the top:

  • Leadership. CEO Rajesh Sharma resigned in Sep 2025. Dr Muthukumar Narayanaswamy (ex-Cummins Meritor) became MD. Founder Ramesh Kunhikannan is now Executive Vice Chairman.
  • Departures. The deputy CFO, two company secretaries and two independent directors left. One independent director, on the audit committee, left three weeks before the Kotak report.
  • The CFO went quiet. CFO Jairam Sampath missed the May 2026 call for health reasons and did not speak in August; the MD answered finance questions.
  • The Kotak report. On 3 Dec 2025, Kotak Institutional Equities found that Kaynes’ FY25 standalone accounts omitted about ₹180 Cr of purchases between group companies and about ₹690 Cr of year-end balances. Kaynes called this “inadvertent”, said the consolidated accounts were correct, and did not restate.
  • Auditor. K.P. Rao & Co. finished its first term; Walker Chandiok (Grant Thornton Bharat) took over from FY27, approved by 98.5% of votes at the Sep 2026 AGM. That is an upgrade.
  • Pay is modest. Executive pay is about ₹7 Cr, about 1.9% of profit. No promoter shares are pledged.

Tone over time: bullish (Jan–Jul 2025), evasive (Nov 2025), defensive (Dec 2025), humbled (May 2026: management apologised for the FY26 miss), cautious (Aug 2026: “It is going to be a tough year”).

FIGURE 11ARGUELABS.IN
Management's tone, call by call: bullish to cautious in 18 monthsOur read of seven earnings calls and the special call on the Kotak reportBullishJan-Jul 2025"$1 bn revenue",chip-plant hypeEvasiveNov 2025Cash questions deflectedDefensiveDec 2025Kotak report:"inadvertent"HumbledMay 2026Apologised for the FY26missCautiousAug 2026"It is going to be a toughyear"time →
SourceKaynes earnings calls, Jan 2025–Aug 2026 · our characterisation

Latest call brief: Q1 FY27 (Aug 2026)

Call grade: CAUTIOUS.

SignalStatusWhat it means
Result qualityWeakSales +40% but profit −24%; EBITDA margin down 120 bp to 15.6%
Management toneHedgedNo numeric guidance; “tough year”; smart-meter plan deferred to Feb 2027
GuidanceCutOSAT + PCB FY27 revenue cut to ₹450–500 Cr; dates pushed a quarter

Why profit fell while sales rose:

FIGURE 12ARGUELABS.IN
Sales rose 40%, profit fell 24%: new-plant costs and tax ate the gainQ1 FY27 consolidated net profit bridge vs Q1 FY26, ₹ Cr (start derived from the reported −24%)0408012074Q1 FY26profit+35Higher EBITDA-21Depreciation-13Other income-9Interest-10Tax rate22%→36%56Q1 FY27profit
SourceQ1 FY27 results and call (8 Aug 2026) · Q1 FY26 base derived from the reported −24%
DriverEffect on profit vs Q1 FY26
Higher EBITDAUp ₹35 Cr (material costs rose to 65.6% of sales from ~58.7%)
Depreciation (new plants)Down ₹21 Cr (+137%)
Other income (QIP cash spent)Down ₹13 Cr (−47%)
InterestDown ₹9 Cr
Tax rate 22% → 36%Down ₹10 Cr

At the old tax rate, profit would have fallen about 8%, not 24%. The standalone parent earned ₹76.9 Cr against ₹56.4 Cr consolidated, so the subsidiaries (new plants, meters) cost about ₹20 Cr in the quarter.

Financials: real profits, missing cash

Kaynes grew revenue nearly 9x in five years and kept margins at 15–16%. But almost none of that profit turned into cash. The gap widened sharply in FY26.

FIGURE 13ARGUELABS.IN
Since FY19: ₹1,006 Cr of profit, -₹550 Cr of operating cashNet profit vs cash from operations, ₹ Cr (consolidated)-600-400-2000200400FY19 profit: ₹10 CrFY19 operating cash flow: ₹-8 CrFY19FY20 profit: ₹9 CrFY20 operating cash flow: ₹45 CrFY20FY21 profit: ₹10 CrFY21 operating cash flow: ₹28 CrFY21FY22 profit: ₹42 CrFY22 operating cash flow: ₹21 CrFY22FY23 profit: ₹95 CrFY23 operating cash flow: ₹-42 CrFY23FY24 profit: ₹183 CrFY24 operating cash flow: ₹88 CrFY24FY25 profit: ₹293 CrFY25 operating cash flow: ₹-82 CrFY25FY26 profit: ₹364 CrFY26 operating cash flow: ₹-600 CrFY26-600364Net profitOperating cash flow (red when negative)
SourceScreener.in consolidated P&L and cash flow · FY19–FY26

Where the cash went (FY26):

  • Receivables: up 166% while revenue grew 33%. Debtor days doubled from 77 to 154, or about 178 including long-dated meter receivables.
  • Smart meters: about ₹1,300 Cr of receivables on ₹971 Cr of revenue, roughly 15 months of sales. Core EMS collects in about 55 days.
  • Factories: ₹1,240 Cr of capex, mostly the new plants.
  • Who paid: the June 2025 ₹1,600 Cr equity raise. Debt stayed flat at about ₹900 Cr.
FIGURE 14ARGUELABS.IN
Smart meters: utilities owe more than a full year of salesKaynes smart-meter business (GridCrest), ₹ Cr. Core EMS collects in ~55 days; meters in ~15 monthsFY26: revenue vs unpaid billsRevenue971Unpaid bills (Jun 2026)1,311Q1 FY27: billed vs collectedBilled240Collected88~37% of the quarter's billing collectedUnpaid bills ≈ 28% of Kaynes' net worth. Q1 figures from the Aug 2026 call (billing approximate).
SourceKaynes FY26 annual report and Aug 2026 call

Profit and loss, actuals and our estimates (₹ Cr; actuals from Screener)

FY24FY25FY26FY27EFY28E
Revenue1,8052,7223,626~4,500~5,575
EBITDA257416578~700~890
EBITDA margin14%15%16%~15.5%~16%
Net profit183293364~290~380
EPS (₹)28.6845.8054.28~43~57
Consensus EPS (₹)57.8888.31
Operating cash flow88−82−600
ROCE14%13%13% (Screener: 12.7%)

Our estimates are below consensus. Depreciation and interest from the new plants arrive before their revenue. The tax rate is running at 34–36%, and treasury income falls as the raised cash is spent.

FIGURE 15ARGUELABS.IN
We expect EPS to fall in FY27; consensus still expects growthEarnings per share, ₹ (actuals from Screener; estimates ours vs MarketScreener consensus)025507510028.7FY2445.8FY2554.3FY26~4357.9FY27E~5788.3FY28EActualOur estimateConsensus
SourceScreener.in (actuals); our estimates; MarketScreener consensus · Oct 2026

Earnings quality checklist

FIGURE 16ARGUELABS.IN
Earnings quality: 2 red, 7 amber, 1 green. Amber leaning redTen forensic tests on FY25-FY26 accounts; details in the table belowREDReceivables vsrevenueREDCash conversioncycleAMBERRevenuerecognitionAMBERRelated-partydisclosureAMBERContingentliabilitiesAMBEROther income shareAMBERTax rateAMBERCapitalised costsAMBERAuditor(improving)GREENGoodwill
SourceOur forensic review of FY25–FY26 filings, Q1 FY27 call
TestRatingEvidence
Receivables vs revenue growthRedReceivables +166% vs revenue +33% (FY26)
Cash conversion cycleRed102 days (FY25) to 193 days (FY26); 70–85 days was promised
Revenue recognitionAmberMeter revenue booked well ahead of collection; no auditor qualification
Related-party disclosureAmberFY25 standalone omissions admitted; no transactions with promoter-owned companies found in H2 FY26
Contingent liabilitiesAmber₹520 Cr (18% of net worth) in FY25, plus ~₹2,180 Cr of guarantees to subsidiaries in H2 FY26
Other income share of pre-tax profitAmber31% in FY26 (interest on raised cash), falling to 16% in Q1 FY27
Tax rateAmber21% to 34–36%; explained by loss-making subsidiaries and non-deductible items
Capitalised costsAmberIntangibles up from ₹224 Cr to ₹520 Cr; intra-group interest capitalised at the new plants
AuditorAmber, improvingSmaller first-term auditor replaced by Walker Chandiok from FY27
GoodwillGreenOnly ₹16 Cr

Verdict: amber leaning red. There is no proof the profits are fake. The problem is cash, concentrated in smart meters, plus a disclosure record that has cost management the benefit of the doubt.

Valuation: what are you paying for?

Valuation verdict (our model): OVERVALUED. Our fair value is ₹1,900–2,350 a share, against ₹3,250 today. On cash flows the stock is priced well above what the business currently earns. The market is paying for the chip-plant option and a cash turnaround that has not yet happened.

Step 1: the de-rating is done, but the multiple is still high. Since IPO the share price has risen about 5.5x, almost exactly in line with EPS. All the 2024–25 multiple expansion has reversed.

FIGURE 17ARGUELABS.IN
The P/E fell from about 200x to 63x: the excitement is gone, the stock is not cheapPrice / trailing 12-month EPS at key events0x50x100x150x200xIPO: 65x at ₹58765xIPONov 22Peak: 204x at ₹7,593204xPeakJan 25Guidance cut: 106x at ₹4,286106xGuidance cutJan 252025 high: 157x at ₹7,705157x2025 highOct 25Analyst meet: 100x at ₹5,778100xAnalyst meetNov 25Kotak report: 67x at ₹3,88167xKotak reportDec 25Q4 miss: 59x at ₹3,18359xQ4 missMay 26Q1 FY27: 75x at ₹3,85075xQ1 FY27Aug 26Today: 63x at ₹3,25063xTodayOct 26
SourceDerived from dated prices (BSE, media) and Screener EPS · Nov 2022–Oct 2026

Step 2: methodology

  • Business type: high-growth, high-mix EMS in a heavy capex phase, with government-subsidised semiconductor plants.
  • Primary method (70% weight): forward P/E on FY28 earnings. Earnings are positive and the market prices this sector on P/E; FY28 is the first year the new plants should contribute.
  • Secondary method (30%): DCF on free cash flow. This is the only method that captures Kaynes’ working-capital problem, which is the core issue.
  • Rejected:
    • P/BV: book value is swollen by recent equity raises.
    • EV/sales: ignores the margin and cash differences that separate Kaynes from peers.

Step 3: key assumptions

AssumptionValueBasis
FY28E EPS₹57 (consensus ₹88)Revenue ~₹5,575 Cr, EBITDA 16%, higher depreciation and interest from new plants, 30% tax
Target P/E40–50x (base 45x)Below high-mix peers (67–101x) given 8.7% ROE and governance history; above Dixon (39x) for growth
DCF WACC13.5%7% risk-free + 1.1 beta × 5.5% premium + governance premium
Revenue growth (DCF)24% FY27–28, fading to 8% by FY36Above management’s “2x market” guide, to give credit for the new plants
EBITDA margin (DCF)15.5% rising to 17%FY26 was 15.9%
Working capital36% of revenue falling to 18% by FY29FY26 was ~36%; 18% assumes smart meters shrink and core EMS stays at ~55 days
Capex₹850 Cr (FY27), ₹700 Cr, ₹500 Cr, ₹450 Cr, then 4% of revenueManagement’s FY27 plan, net of subsidy
Terminal growth6%India nominal GDP
Shares / net debt6.72 crore / ₹115 CrScreener

Step 4: the numbers

  • P/E method: ₹57 × 45 = ₹2,565 (range ₹2,280–2,850).
  • DCF: ₹1,093 (range ₹861–1,489). About 70% of DCF value is in the terminal value, and working capital eats most of the cash in the first three years.
  • Blended (70/30): ₹2,125, band ₹1,900–2,350.
FIGURE 18ARGUELABS.IN
Our fair value sits well below today's price; only analyst targets are above itValue per share by method, ₹ (bar = range, dot = central case)1,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,0007,000DCF (WACC 12.5-14.5%, growth 5-7%)DCF (WACC 12.5-14.5%, growth 5-7%): ₹861-1,489P/E: FY28E EPS ₹57 x 40-50P/E: FY28E EPS ₹57 x 40-50: ₹2,280-2,850Blended fair value (70/30)Blended fair value (70/30): ₹1,900-2,350Bear / base / bull (mid-2028)Bear / base / bull (mid-2028): ₹1,400-4,400Analyst targets (23)Analyst targets (23): ₹2,790-5,00052-week trading range52-week trading range: ₹2,995-6,998Today ₹3,250
SourceOur DCF and P/E models; MarketScreener (11 Sep 2026); Screener.in · as of 20 Oct 2026
FIGURE 19ARGUELABS.IN
To justify ₹3,250 you need consensus earnings or a 60x multipleValue per share, ₹. Green = at or above today's ₹3,250; amber = ₹2,500-3,249; red = belowP/E method: FY28 EPS × P/E35x40x45x50x60x₹401,4001,6001,8002,0002,400₹501,7502,0002,2502,5003,000₹57 base1,9952,2802,5652,8503,420₹702,4502,8003,1503,5004,200₹88 cons.3,0803,5203,9604,4005,280DCF: WACC × terminal growth5%6%7%12.5%1,1781,3091,48913.5%1,0001,0931,21414.5%8619281,014Every DCF case is under halfof today's price.Boxed = our base case. P/E values are FY28E EPS × multiple, around mid-2028, before dividends.
SourceOur P/E and DCF models · as of 20 Oct 2026

What you have to believe to pay ₹3,250: FY28 EPS of about ₹72 at 45x, or the full consensus ₹88 at 37x. That needs the new plants on time, smart-meter cash collected, and the tax rate back near 25%. Our reverse DCF needs about 30–45% revenue growth a year for five years just to reach ₹1,700–2,500.

Bear, base, bull (value around mid-2028, FY28 EPS × P/E, before dividends)

CaseWhat happensFY28 EPSP/EValuevs ₹3,250
BearPlants slip again, meter write-downs, more dilution₹4035x₹1,400−57%
BasePlants ramp in H2 FY27, meters shrink slowly, tax stays high₹5745x₹2,565−21%
BullConsensus delivered, cash turns positive, chip plant wins new customers₹8850x₹4,400+35%
FIGURE 20ARGUELABS.IN
Two of three cases sit below today's priceValue around mid-2028 = FY28 EPS × P/E, before dividends. Illustrative.₹1,000₹2,000₹3,000₹4,000₹5,000Today ₹3,250Street avg ₹3,715BearEPS ₹40 × 35xPlants slip, meter write-downs, dilution₹1,400 (-57%)BaseEPS ₹57 × 45xPlants ramp H2 FY27, meters shrink slowly₹2,565 (-21%)BullEPS ₹88 × 50xConsensus delivered, cash turns positive₹4,400 (+35%)
SourceOur scenarios; street average from 23 analysts · as of 20 Oct 2026
FIGURE 21ARGUELABS.IN
Today's price is 53% above our blended fair valueFair value, today's price and margin-of-safety entry points, ₹ per sharepremium you pay today: ₹1,125 a share1,5002,0002,5003,0003,5004,000Our fair value ₹2,125Today ₹3,250Street avg target ₹3,71552-week low ₹2,995Margin-of-safety entries:₹1,910 (10%) · ₹1,805 (15%) · ₹1,700 (20%)
SourceOur blended valuation; Screener.in price and 52-week range · 19 Oct 2026

Where the street stands: 23 analysts, average rating Hold, average target ₹3,715 (range ₹2,790–5,000). After Q1 FY27, only Motilal Oswal (₹5,000) and Jefferies (₹4,480) said Buy. JPMorgan, CLSA, Nomura, JM, Nuvama and Equirus were Neutral, Hold or Reduce. FY27 consensus EPS has already fallen about 55% since Dec 2025. Our numbers are lower because we expect more cuts.

Our model is deliberately strict on cash. If working capital falls to Syrma-like levels (~48 days) and the plants hit management’s targets, value rises sharply. That is the bull case.

Risks

FIGURE 22ARGUELABS.IN
Cash burn and the smart-meter dues are the risks to watch mostWatch closelyLikely, manageableLess likely, costlyBackgroundProbability in the next 12-18 months →Impact onvalue ↑Cash burn forces moredilution or debtSmart-meter dueswritten downMore earnings cutsChip/PCB plants slip againSubsidy paid lateNew disclosure lapseAuto/industrial slowdownPlacement is our judgement from the evidence in this post, not a model output.
SourceRisk map · 7 risks, placed by judgement

Downside risks:

  • Cash burn and dilution.
    • Q1 FY27 operating cash flow was −₹259 Cr, and FY27 capex is about ₹850 Cr.
    • A reported $1 bn chip-plant expansion is on the table.
    • Without fast collections, another equity raise is likely.
    • Probability: high; impact: high. Monitor half-year cash flow (Nov 2026).
  • Smart-meter dues.
    • ₹1,311 Cr is owed by state utilities, about 28% of net worth.
    • Only ₹88 Cr was collected in Q1 against about ₹240 Cr billed.
    • Probability: medium; impact: high. Monitor the Feb 2027 strategy update.
  • More earnings cuts. Consensus FY27 EPS of ₹58 needs the next three quarters to beat last year by about 15%, after a 24% fall in Q1. Probability: high; impact: medium-high.
  • Plant delays. Both new plants have slipped two or three times already. Probability: high; impact: medium.
  • Disclosure. CRISIL lists “further disclosure lapses or adverse auditor observations” as a trigger. The new auditor’s first full-year report (FY27) is the test. Probability: low-medium; impact: high.

Upside risks (things that could prove us wrong):

  • The chip plant wins a large customer. It could sign a big multinational or win an anchor order beyond Alpha & Omega and Infineon.
  • Smart meters are sold or spun off. That would release most of the ₹1,300 Cr of tied-up cash.
  • The cash cycle normalises. If debtor days fall back toward 90–100, cash flow turns positive and the stock re-rates toward high-mix peers at 80–100x.
  • Core EMS keeps growing fast. It grew 48–53% in Q1 FY27 and collects its cash.

Conclusion

Kaynes is a real business with a real edge: high-margin, hard-to-switch electronics work, and one of India’s first chip-packaging plants, half paid for by the government. The core EMS business grew about 50% in Q1 FY27 and collects its cash.

But the company grew faster than its cash, then bought a smart-meter business whose customers don’t pay. Promises on revenue, cash and dates have been missed again and again. Disclosure slips cost it the market’s trust. At ₹3,250 and 63x trailing earnings, the stock still prices in a turnaround that has not started.

In one line: a good factory story attached to a bad cash story, still priced for the good one.

Bottom line (research, not investment advice):

  • Valuation verdict: overvalued; fair value ₹1,900–2,350 (blended P/E and DCF).
  • Base case: value around mid-2028 of ₹2,565, about 21% below today.
  • Who the story suits: only someone who believes the chip plant becomes a national champion and can sit through more dilution. Not for anyone who needs cash-backed earnings.

What would prove this view wrong (thesis invalidation triggers):

  1. Operating cash flow turns positive for two quarters in a row, and debtor days fall below 110.
  2. OSAT and PCB plants book at least ₹450 Cr of revenue in H2 FY27 at positive EBITDA.
  3. The smart-meter business is sold or restructured in a way that releases at least ₹800 Cr of cash.

The 60-second version: Q1 FY27 looked like 40% growth but was a 24% profit fall, driven by new-plant depreciation, lost treasury income and a 36% tax rate; at the old tax rate it was about −8%. Core EMS is healthy: it grew about 50%, earns ~16% margins and collects in ~55 days. The damage is smart meters, with ₹1,311 Cr of unpaid bills on ₹971 Cr of revenue, plus ₹850 Cr of capex this year. The multi-bagger case rests on the Sanand chip plant and the Chennai PCB plant, both about 55% subsidised and both starting revenue in Q3 FY27, at least two quarters late. The next catalyst is the H1 cash-flow statement with Q2 results. The biggest risk is another equity raise at these prices. Our fair value is ₹1,900–2,350; two quarters of positive cash flow would make us revisit it.

What to track

Q2 FY27 results (due by 14 Nov 2026):

  1. Cash flow. H1 operating cash flow, and whether the “70–80% reduction in negative cash flow by Q3” is on track.
  2. Smart-meter collections vs billings; any write-down.
  3. Plant timelines. First revenue from Sanand Unit 2 and the Chennai PCB plant.
  4. Margins and tax. Gross margin (material costs were 65.6% of sales in Q1) and whether the tax rate eases from 36%.
  5. Order book above ₹8,904 Cr, and new wins in auto, aerospace and railways.
  6. Funding. Any talk of a new equity raise or the $1 bn chip expansion.

Later:

  • Smart-meter strategy at the Feb 2027 results (around 15 Feb 2027)
  • OSAT subsidy received beyond ₹170 Cr
  • The new auditor’s first full-year report (FY27)
  • CRISIL rating review

How this was researched

We ran seven research tracks in parallel: forensics, two sets of earnings calls, management, growth engines, industry, and brokers with the bear case. An independent fact-checker then re-verified 13 key claims against primary sources. Financial figures for Kaynes and peers come from Screener.in (fetched 20 Oct 2026, price as of 19 Oct close). The valuation models and estimates are ours.

Limits:

  • TV interviews (CNBC-TV18, ET Now) were not available as transcripts.
  • The financial notes in the FY25 and FY26 annual reports could not be fully opened, so receivables ageing and the FY26 contingent-liability total are unverified.
  • The Feb 2026 call came from secondary transcripts.

Main sources:


Data as of 20 Oct 2026 (prices as of 19 Oct close). This is research, not a recommendation to buy or sell; do your own research.